<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CarSeekBlog &#187; Chevy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carseekblog.com/category/chevy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carseekblog.com</link>
	<description>because there&#039;s more to cars than merely driving</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NHTSA Releases First Batch of 2012 Crash Test Results</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/12/07/nhtsa-releases-first-batch-of-2012-crash-test-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/12/07/nhtsa-releases-first-batch-of-2012-crash-test-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crash tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHTSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first crash test results for 2012 model-year cars were released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) earlier this month, and the news isn&#8217;t great. Under the stricter guidelines in place for 2011 and forward, only three cars have earned five-star composite ratings so far. Those three cars are the 2012 Cadillac CTS, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.carseekblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/2012-NHTSA.jpg" alt="NHTSA 2012 Ratings" title="5-star" width="500" height="468" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-725" /></p>
<p>The first crash test results for 2012 model-year cars were released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) earlier this month, and the news isn&#8217;t great. Under the stricter guidelines in place for 2011 and forward, only three cars have earned five-star composite ratings so far. Those three cars are the 2012 <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/cadillac/cts/">Cadillac CTS</a>, <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/chevrolet/camaro/">Chevrolet Camaro</a>, and <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/toyota/camry/">Toyota Camry</a>, and of those three cars, only the Camaro scored 5 stars in every category. </p>
<p>The composite scores are based on ratings (on a scale of five) for frontal, rollover, and combined side-pole and barrier crash tests. The side-pole test is new, and simulates a side-impact crash into a pole or tree that is ten inches in diameter, with a vehicle traveling at 20 mph, and impact occurring at a 75-degree angle just aft of the driver&#8217;s side A-pillar. </p>
<p>The chart above shows the results of the first 22 2012 models to have gone through the crash testing. NHTSA has plans to test a total of 74 models for this model year. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/12/07/nhtsa-releases-first-batch-of-2012-crash-test-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Tuesday: 2012 Chevrolet Cruze</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/09/20/media-tuesday-2012-chevrolet-cruze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/09/20/media-tuesday-2012-chevrolet-cruze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Chevrolet Cruze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruze Eco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To eco or not to eco, that is the question. Okay, maybe it&#8217;s not since the eco version of the 2012 Chevrolet Cruze only comes in a stick-shift version. Still, it&#8217;s not a bad car either way, as this review shows. Enjoy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To eco or not to eco, that is the question. Okay, maybe it&#8217;s not since the eco version of the <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/chevrolet/2012-cruze/">2012 Chevrolet Cruze</a> only comes in a stick-shift version. Still, it&#8217;s not a bad car either way, as this review shows. Enjoy. </p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="254" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/hcbboHgYf6k" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/09/20/media-tuesday-2012-chevrolet-cruze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PA Woman Sues GM for Impala Defect</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/07/13/pa-woman-sues-gm-for-impala-defect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/07/13/pa-woman-sues-gm-for-impala-defect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet Impala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woman in Pennsylvania has sued General Motors Co. in an attempt to force the car maker to address issues with the rear ends of more than 400,000 2007 and 2008 Chevrolet Impalas. This comes three years after dealers were instructed by GM to replace the rear-wheel spindle rods on police department Impalas because of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman in Pennsylvania has sued General Motors Co. in an attempt to force the car maker to address issues with the rear ends of more than 400,000 2007 and <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/chevrolet/2008impala/">2008 Chevrolet Impalas</a>. This comes three years after dealers were instructed by GM to replace the rear-wheel spindle rods on police department Impalas because of an issue that could cause tires to wear out prematurely. </p>
<p>The lawsuit, which is also seeking class-action status, says that GM should make the same repair to Impalas sold to general consumers (rather than the police) because they have the same spindle rod issue. It also charges GM with &#8220;breech of warranty,&#8221; and demands that the automobile company be compelled to either repair or replace the rear spindle rods. </p>
<p>Specifically, the lawsuit points out that, &#8220;There are no relevant material differences between police vehicles and class members’ vehicles relating the defective spindle rods.&#8221;</p>
<p>GM, which built about 24,000 of the police versions of the Impala in the 2007 and 2008 model years, declined to comment, claiming it never discusses matters in litigation, but the company did confirm that dealers had been notified of the rear suspension defect. The lawsuit says this defect applies to the 423,000 Chevrolet Impalas that were sold in those two years. </p>
<p>The plaintiff in the lawsuit, Donna Trusky of Blakely, PA, bought her Impala in February, 2008, but according to the lawsuit the tread on her car&#8217;s back tires was so worn that safe use was &#8220;questionable&#8221; after only 6,000 miles. Her dealer supplied new tires and re-aligned the front end of her car, but never mentioned the rear spindle rods. In November, 2010, with only a bit over 24,000 miles on the car, Trusky had to replace the back tires again, at a cost of roughly $290. </p>
<p>Speaking about GM, the lawsuit said, &#8220;Defendant concealed the existence of the defect from class members, even those who presented their vehicles for repair of the defect.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ms. Trusky&#8217;s lawyers said that complaints about the Chevrolet Impala&#8217;s rear suspension issues have been filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/07/13/pa-woman-sues-gm-for-impala-defect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Monday: 2011 Chevy Volt</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/07/04/media-monday-2011-chevy-volt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/07/04/media-monday-2011-chevy-volt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chevy volt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahh, the 4th of July. A day to celebrate Americana, whether it&#8217;s with hot dogs and watermelon, apple pie, or Chevrolet. Not just any Chevrolet will do, however &#8211; we&#8217;re a decade into the twenty-first century so for this Independence Day, we&#8217;re celebrating the 2011 Chevy Volt, which represents the perfect blend of environmental consciousness [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, the 4th of July. A day to celebrate Americana, whether it&#8217;s with hot dogs and watermelon, apple pie, or Chevrolet. Not just <em>any</em> Chevrolet will do, however &#8211; we&#8217;re a decade into the twenty-first century so for this Independence Day, we&#8217;re celebrating the <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/chevrolet/2011-volt/">2011 Chevy Volt</a>, which represents the perfect blend of environmental consciousness and American branding. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the CNET video all about it. Enjoy:<br />
<iframe width="499" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DPKjej-P7vc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/07/04/media-monday-2011-chevy-volt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM Idling Plants in July</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/06/17/gm-idling-plants-in-july/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/06/17/gm-idling-plants-in-july/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[General Motors Corporation shared today that the company is planning to idle two of it&#8217;s truck plants for two weeks in July because of an overstock in 2012 models. During the weeks between July 4th and July 17th, GM will be stopping production at the Flint Assembly plant in Michigan and the Fort Wayne Assembly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>General Motors Corporation shared today that the company is planning to idle two of it&#8217;s truck plants for two weeks in July because of an overstock in 2012 models. </p>
<p>During the weeks between July 4th and July 17th, GM will be stopping production at the Flint Assembly plant in Michigan and the Fort Wayne Assembly plant in Indiana. The information came from GM spokesperson Tom Wickham and UAW Local 2209 president Orval Plumlee. Plumlee&#8217;s organization represents the hourly workers at the Indiana facility.  </p>
<p>The two plants are responsible for producing the<a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/chevrolet/silverado-3500hd-dually-4wd/"> Chevrolet Silverado</a> and <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/gmc/sierra-3500hd-dually-4wd/">GMC Sierra pickups</a>.  At the end of May, the company&#8217;s truck inventory included a supply for 110 days of sales, or 258,000 units, according to information provided by GM&#8217;s vice president of U.S. sales, Don Johnson.  This number is significantly higher than the industry standard of a 60-day supply. </p>
<p>Despite this apparent overload, Mark Reuss, present of North American operations for GM, said that in the short term, the level of inventory was acceptable, and that inventory-clearing incentives weren&#8217;t likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/06/17/gm-idling-plants-in-july/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hybrid in the HOV Lane? Your Days May Be Numbered</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/06/08/hybrid-in-the-hov-lane-your-days-may-be-numbered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/06/08/hybrid-in-the-hov-lane-your-days-may-be-numbered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California diamond lane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOV benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug-ins and hybrids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When hybrid vehicles were first sold, one of the perks &#8211; at least in places like California &#8211; was the privilege of driving in the carpool/diamond/HOV lane even if you were the only person in your car. Last year, owners of such vehicles were given a six-month extension on that perk, but even as hybrid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When hybrid vehicles were first sold, one of the perks &#8211; at least in places like California &#8211; was the privilege of driving in the carpool/diamond/HOV lane even if you were the only person in your car. Last year, owners of such vehicles were given a six-month extension on that perk, but even as hybrid owners, including John Burton, California Democratic Party chairman and Prius driver, try to get the extension extended again, Honda, Ford and others are working in opposition. </p>
<p>A few weeks ago, on May 9th, representatives of those automakers sent a letter to the chair of California&#8217;s Senate Transportation and Housing committee, Mark DeSaulnier, which stated, in part, &#8220;It is… unfortunate that there is an effort underway yet again to extend the yellow sticker program, and that legislation to do so is being sought. We do not support any further extensions of the yellow sticker program.&#8221;</p>
<p>The point of the letter isn&#8217;t that Ford, Honda, et al, believe such incentives are bad, merely that the original class of hybrids are no longer in need of such an incentive. As the letter explains, &#8220;Continued extensions of the program do not serve to incentivize sales of hybrid vehicles as the cap on yellow stickers was reached approximately seven years ago, shortly after the program&#8217;s inception.&#8221; The letter also adds that, the extension of such privileges to July 1st was granted &#8220;&#8230;without any public airing of the issue during two years of debate over the future HOV program.&#8221;</p>
<p>Currently, Ford and Honda are tied as the second-biggest hybrid car sellers, behind the reigning Toyota. All three companies, along with GM, Nissan, and others, have plug-in and alternative-fuel cars in their present or future product lines, and those vehicles are eligible for white stickers (solo EV drivers) and/or green ones (solo plug-in hybrid drivers). </p>
<p>Leland Yee, the California Senator who authored the bill granting the HOV extension until July 1st, said at the time that the goal of doing so was to give hybrid owners in his state time to purchase the electric  and plug-in vehicles coming to market, but now those cars have arrived. The <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/nissan/2011-leaf/">all-electric Nissan LEAF </a>and the plug-in hybrid Toyota Prius due in 2012 both qualify, and while the 2011 Chevrolet Volt does not, the 2012 Volt should. </p>
<p>The letter in questions was signed by officials from Ford and Honda, as well as representatives of the California Natural Gas Vehicle Association, Clean Energy Fuels, and Plug-In America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/06/08/hybrid-in-the-hov-lane-your-days-may-be-numbered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM Issues Recall for Chevrolet Cruze</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/04/15/gm-issues-recall-for-chevrolet-cruze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/04/15/gm-issues-recall-for-chevrolet-cruze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recall Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet Cruze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevy Cruze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GM has issued a recall for about 2,100 Chevrolet Cruzes that might have steering wheels that are not installed correctly. The recall was prompted by an incident in Minnesota last month, where a white Cruze LT lost its steering wheel while traveling with prevailing traffic on a local highway. Fortunately, the driver was able to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM has issued a recall for about 2,100 <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> Cruzes that might have steering wheels that are not installed correctly.</p>
<p>The recall was prompted by an incident in Minnesota last month, where a white Cruze LT lost its steering wheel while traveling with prevailing traffic on a local highway. Fortunately, the driver was able to get the car off the road without hitting anything or anyone, and there were no injuries, but the wheel did become completely separated from the steering column.  </p>
<p>A spokesperson for GM said that this is an isolated issue, but has issued the recall anyway. The cars in question will be examined to make sure the steering wheels are properly attached. While there have been no other reports of this issue, GM does warn that if the steering wheel feels loose on the column, it is a cause for concern. </p>
<p>This recall is limited to Chevy Cruzes that were produced in GM&#8217;s Lordstown, OH, plant, and meant for the North American market. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/04/15/gm-issues-recall-for-chevrolet-cruze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM Reopens Shreveport Plant</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/03/25/gm-reopens-shreveport-plant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/03/25/gm-reopens-shreveport-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunami]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Automotive News reported this morning that General Motors has announced that after a week-long shutdown because of a short supply of parts from Japan, it will be reopening its assembly plant in Shreveport, Louisiana on Monday. GM closed the plant, which specializes in small pickups like the GMC Canyon and Chevrolet Colorado, because of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.autonews.com">Automotive News</a> reported this morning that General Motors has announced that after a week-long shutdown because of a short supply of parts from Japan, it will be reopening its assembly plant in Shreveport, Louisiana on Monday. </p>
<p>GM closed the plant, which specializes in small pickups like the GMC Canyon and Chevrolet Colorado, because of a &#8220;&#8230;parts shortage related to the crisis in Japan&#8230;&#8221; but it the parts that were affected has not been specified. Instead, GM spokesperson Kim Carpenter verified in an email, &#8220;We have the material we need to resume production.&#8221; </p>
<p>Analysts have theorized that GM idled the plant in order to redirect Japanese parts to better-selling vehicles, as it gauges the fiscal impact of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami on March 11th. </p>
<p>In January and February, GM sold 4,810 Colorados, which is fifty-one percent more units sold than in the same two months last year. As of the first of March, 2011, the automaker had a 58-day inventory of the pickups. GM also sold 21 percent more Canyons in the first two months of 2011 than it did in the same months of 2010, making 1,459 vehicles sold, with a 60-day supply in inventory. </p>
<p>In a press release, GM said, &#8220;We are constantly assessing the situation and anticipating adjustments in our plants around the world as needed.&#8221;</p>
<p>The release continued, &#8220;These adjustments may include optimizing the usage of parts that are &#8212; or will be &#8212; in short supply, modifications to manufacturing schedules and temporary suspensions of production.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ms. Carpenter said that GM will be recalling 59 workers who were laid off from its plant in Tonawanda, N.Y., which makes the engines for the trucks produced in Shreveport. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/03/25/gm-reopens-shreveport-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Monday: GLEE Chevrolet Commercial</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/02/21/media-monday-glee-chevrolet-commercial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/02/21/media-monday-glee-chevrolet-commercial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[see the usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This commercial, which debuted on Super Bowl Sunday, combines two pop culture icons: the FOX TV show GLEE and Chevrolet&#8216;s iconic song, being heard for the first time in this generation. We couldn&#8217;t NOT share it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This commercial, which debuted on Super Bowl Sunday, combines two pop culture icons: the FOX TV show GLEE and <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a>&#8216;s iconic song, being heard for the first time in this generation. We couldn&#8217;t NOT share it. </p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="500" height="311" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/o9_HK2dlCPk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/02/21/media-monday-glee-chevrolet-commercial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Video: Chevy Volt Super Bowl Commercial</title>
		<link>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/02/04/special-video-chevy-volt-super-bowl-commercial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/02/04/special-video-chevy-volt-super-bowl-commercial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chevy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carseekblog.com/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, we know we generally only do videos on Monday, but for Super Bowl weekend, we&#8217;re making an exception, and sharing the pre-released Chevy Volt commercial that will be airing on Sunday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, we know we generally only do videos on Monday, but for Super Bowl weekend, we&#8217;re making an exception, and sharing the pre-released <a href="http://www.carseek.com/reviews/chevrolet/2011-volt/">Chevy Volt </a>commercial that will be airing on Sunday.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="499" height="311" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qEzWNj2LHMY?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carseekblog.com/2011/02/04/special-video-chevy-volt-super-bowl-commercial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

